Normalize
Group similar customer questions into one approved answer instead of writing from scratch every time.
Generate a practical answer library, request missing evidence, score readiness, and decide whether automation software is worth it.
Select your security review profile. The tool creates a practical first library you can copy or download.
B2B SaaS team
Use this output as the source-backed base for repeated customer security questions. Add real evidence links, review dates, exceptions, and customer-safe proof before sending answers externally, exporting back to Excel, or deciding whether software is worth it.
Workflow: build the answer library, request missing evidence, score readiness, then evaluate software only if the workflow is breaking.
| Category | Question | Draft answer | Evidence | Owner | Review | Claim level | Customer-safe evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security programKeep the answer tied to current policies and named owners. | Do you maintain a formal information security program? | Yes. We maintain a documented security program with assigned ownership, policies, access controls, incident response, and periodic review. | Security policy, owner record, risk register, SOC 2 or ISO evidence | Security / Operations | Quarterly | Growth | Policy excerpt, SOC 2 section, or trust center page. |
| Access controlAvoid saying access is reviewed unless a review record exists. | How do you control employee access to customer data? | Access is role-based, granted by business need, reviewed periodically, and removed during offboarding. | Access control policy, access review record, offboarding checklist, IdP screenshots | IT / Security | Quarterly | Growth | Access review summary, policy excerpt, or IdP control screenshot. |
| EncryptionConfirm exceptions for logs, backups, exports, or third-party systems. | Is customer data encrypted in transit and at rest? | Customer data is encrypted in transit using TLS and encrypted at rest using managed cloud encryption controls. | Architecture note, cloud provider docs, encryption policy, SOC 2 section | Engineering | Semiannual | Startup | Architecture note, SOC 2 excerpt, or cloud encryption control reference. |
| Incident responseDo not promise notification timelines that legal has not approved. | Do you have an incident response process? | Yes. We maintain an incident response process with escalation, investigation, customer notification assessment, and post-incident review. | Incident response policy, tabletop record, escalation contacts, notification procedure | Security / Legal | Annual | Growth | IR policy excerpt, tabletop summary, or notification process summary. |
| Answer governanceAI-drafted answers should be marked as draft until reviewed. | How are security questionnaire answers approved before submission? | Reusable answers are reviewed by the relevant owner and customer-facing responses are approved before submission. | Answer library, reviewer field, approval history, submitted questionnaire log | GRC / Sales engineering | Quarterly | Startup | Reviewer status, approval timestamp, and submitted-answer history. |
| Third-party riskKeep AI providers, analytics vendors, and support tools in scope. | Do you use subprocessors or third-party service providers? | Yes. We maintain a list of relevant subprocessors and review vendors based on data access, criticality, and risk. | Subprocessor list, vendor review record, DPA, supplier risk assessment | Privacy / Security | Semiannual | Growth | Public subprocessor list, DPA summary, and vendor review status. |
After the answer library is generated, use the evidence checklist to replace broad claims with customer-safe proof, then run the scorecard to decide whether the process is ready for automation software.
Start small: use the generated library for the next real customer questionnaire, then add evidence and reviewer notes.
Group similar customer questions into one approved answer instead of writing from scratch every time.
Link each answer to SOC 2 sections, policy pages, trust-center docs, owners, or system evidence.
Assign security, privacy, legal, or product reviewers before responses go to a customer.
Use the gaps and repeated-question volume to decide whether questionnaire automation software is worth it.